The International Journal of Legal Review and Research (IJLRAR) adopts a transparent, structured, and rigorous double-blind peer review process to uphold the highest standards of academic integrity and scholarly excellence. Each stage of the review process is designed to ensure fairness, objectivity, and quality.

Initial Editorial Assessment:

All submitted manuscripts undergo a preliminary evaluation by the editorial team to assess originality, relevance to the journal’s scope, compliance with submission guidelines, and overall academic quality.

Double-Blind Peer Review:

Manuscripts that clear the initial screening are reviewed by a minimum of two independent subject-matter experts. The identities of both authors and reviewers remain confidential throughout the process to ensure impartial and unbiased evaluation.

Reviewer Evaluation and Feedback:

Reviewers provide detailed, constructive comments focusing on legal reasoning, methodology, originality, and contribution to existing legal literature. These comments are shared with the authors to support academic improvement.

Revision and Resubmission:

Where revisions are recommended, authors are required to submit a revised manuscript along with a point-by-point response to reviewer comments. Manuscripts that do not adequately address the feedback may be rejected.

Final Editorial Decision:

The final decision regarding acceptance, revision, or rejection rests with the editorial board, based on reviewer recommendations, the quality of revisions, and the manuscript’s overall scholarly merit.